ICT in Education Toolkit

1. Identification of Priority Areas for ICT Intervention

Step 1. Establishing Priority Educational Areas Derived From National Priorities

After a review of national visions, goals and plans (Tool 1.1) and educational structure (Tool 1.2), identify areas of pressing needs under different educational objectives.

Once you define the elements of the priority item, give it a distinctive title.

There may be more than one priority area under an educational objective. Complete a separate form for each priority item.

Creating List of Priority Educational Areas Derived from National Priorities

Educational Objective:


Priority Item Title:



To define a priority area, select one or more options for each of the four categories below.

Educational Level
(You may specify more than one option)
 Not applicable
 All Levels
 Early Childhood Development
 Primary education
 Secondary education
 Tertiary education
 Adult non-vocational
 Vocational and technical education

Target Population
(You may specify more than one option)
 No specific target population
 Urban Areas
 Rural Areas
 Girls and Women
 Ethnic and/or linguistic minorities
 Learners with Disabilities
 Others

(Please Specify):


Special Curricular Emphasis
(You may specify more than one option)
 Not applicable
 All curricula
 Teacher Training
 Science education
 Health education
 Civic education
 Learners with disabilities
 Others

(Please Specify):


Specific Problems Focus
(specify)

 
  Step 1. Establishing Priority Educational Areas Derived From National Priorities
 
Open and print the follow files.

Review thoroughly the information in these files, and, in light of this information, identify educational areas of pressing high priority and summarize in the corresponding forms, as described below:

For consistency throughout the Toolkit, priority areas will be listed by educational objective. The educational objectives have been grouped under eight categories and are defined and discussed in Resource Handbook 1: ICT-in-Education Essentials. Click on each link below to view explainations and related resources.

To create the list of pressing priority educational areas under a specific objective, click the "Create Priority Item". Every time a FORM is submitted, a List Item is created  and its title appears under the Priority List, linked to that Item.



Degree of Educational Urgency/Priority


Priority Item Details
Educational Objective:
Priority Item:


Educational Level:
Target Population:
Special Curricular Emphasis:
Specific Problems Focus:


Establish the degree of educational urgency/priority of the item by completing the questionnaire below.

Severity of Present Situation
Stage 1: Present situation is not severe or dire; addressing this area may divert needed resources from more urgent areas
Stage 2: Present situation is moderately urgent and addressing it now is advisable
Stage 3: Present situation is urgent and needs to be addressed
Stage 4: Present situation is extremely severe and addressing it is crucial to meet national and educational objectives

Magnitude of the gap between the goal and present situation
Stage 1: Gap between current situation and goals is non-existent or minimal; addressing this area may divert needed resources from more urgent areas
Stage 2: The gap between current situation and goals is small but addressing it now is advisable.
Stage 3: The gap between current situation and goals is large and needs to be addressed.
Stage 4: The gap between current situation and goals is severe and addressing it is crucial to meet national and educational objectives.

Lack of progress in attaining goal
Stage 1: Significant progress has been made in attaining goal and additional intervention may not be necessary.
Stage 2: Some progress has been made in attaining goal; a change in current strategies may be needed.
Stage 3: Minimum progress has been made in attaining goal; a change of strategies is needed.
Stage 4: No progress has been made in attaining goal; addressing the situation is urgent.

Problems with existing plans/initiatives
Stage 1: Existing plans and initiatives are of high quality.
Stage 2: Existing plans and initiatives are of moderate quality.
Stage 3: Existing plans and initiatives are based on assumptions rather than research-based knowledge.
Stage 4: Existing plans and initiatives are poorly formulated.

Degree of Educational Urgency/Priority
(Once the form is submitted a graphic summary appears below)
Degree of Educational Urgency/Priority


Priority Item Details
Educational Objective:
Priority Item:


Educational Level:
Target Population:
Special Curricular Emphasis:
Specific Problems Focus:


Establish the degree of educational urgency/priority of the item by completing the questionnaire below.

Severity of Present Situation
Stage 1: Present situation is not severe or dire; addressing this area may divert needed resources from more urgent areas
Stage 2: Present situation is moderately urgent and addressing it now is advisable
Stage 3: Present situation is urgent and needs to be addressed
Stage 4: Present situation is extremely severe and addressing it is crucial to meet national and educational objectives

Magnitude of the gap between the goal and present situation
Stage 1: Gap between current situation and goals is non-existent or minimal; addressing this area may divert needed resources from more urgent areas
Stage 2: The gap between current situation and goals is small but addressing it now is advisable.
Stage 3: The gap between current situation and goals is large and needs to be addressed.
Stage 4: The gap between current situation and goals is severe and addressing it is crucial to meet national and educational objectives.

Lack of progress in attaining goal
Stage 1: Significant progress has been made in attaining goal and additional intervention may not be necessary.
Stage 2: Some progress has been made in attaining goal; a change in current strategies may be needed.
Stage 3: Minimum progress has been made in attaining goal; a change of strategies is needed.
Stage 4: No progress has been made in attaining goal; addressing the situation is urgent.

Problems with existing plans/initiatives
Stage 1: Existing plans and initiatives are of high quality.
Stage 2: Existing plans and initiatives are of moderate quality.
Stage 3: Existing plans and initiatives are based on assumptions rather than research-based knowledge.
Stage 4: Existing plans and initiatives are poorly formulated.

Degree of Educational Urgency/Priority
(Once the form is submitted a graphic summary appears below)
 
  Step 2. Revising Educational Priority Lists in Light of Educational Goals and Plans
 


Access and Print from the Filing Cabinet the following files related to Tool 1.2:


Educational Goals and Plans

    Use the information in these files to revise the priority lists generated in Step 1 by performing any or all the following three activities: :

    • Adding priority items, by clicking on the "Create Priority Item" below
    • Establishing the degree of priority/urgency of each priority item, by clicking on the corresponding title of the item in the list below
    • Deleting priority items in light of the above analysis and expert input when applicable.

    Expert input from knowledgeable individuals or institutions may be sought in one of two ways:
    The Team can download each list and send it to the designated persons to be complete the necessary questionnaires and return to the Team.
    The Facilitation Team sends the list through the Toolkit to designated individuals who will complete it online. Use the [Send out Survey] button. The Facilitation Team is able to view the results and save them.




    Step 3: Revising Educational Priority Lists in Light of Potential of ICT interventions

    Enhancing quality of learning

    Priority Item - Improving facilities for teaching and learning process

    Priority Item Details

    Educational Objective: Enhancing quality of learning
    Priority Item: Improving facilities for teaching and learning process


    Educational Level: All Levels
    Target Population: No specific target population
    Special Curricular Emphasis: All curricula
    Specific Problems Focus:
    literacy and numeracy skills.


    Degree of Educational Urgency/Priority

    Last updated on 26 September 2006

    Expanding educational opportunities

    Priority Item - Reviewing the option alternatives in the school

    Priority Item Details

    Educational Objective: Expanding educational opportunities
    Priority Item: Reviewing the option alternatives in the school


    Educational Level: Secondary education
    Target Population: No specific target population
    Special Curricular Emphasis: All curricula
    Specific Problems Focus:


    Degree of Educational Urgency/Priority

    Last updated on 26 September 2006

    Improving policy planning and management

    Priority Item - Review Policy planning processes

    Priority Item Details

    Educational Objective: Improving policy planning and management
    Priority Item: Review Policy planning processes


    Educational Level: All Levels
    Target Population: No specific target population
    Special Curricular Emphasis: All curricula
    Specific Problems Focus:
    Encourage transparency through forward planning and the use of a structured management sysytem.


    Degree of Educational Urgency/Priority

    Last updated on 26 September 2006


    Educational Priority in Light of Potential of ICT interventions
    Estimate the potential/value of ICT interventions in advancing the educational objective of this priority area, by selecting one of the following categories:
     None  Unclear  Low  Moderate  High  Critical 
     
      Step 3. Revising Educational Priority Lists in Light of Potential of ICT interventions
     


    Assess for each priority area in your revised list, the potential of ICT interventions in enhancing the achievement of the corresponding educational goals and related plans/initiatives. To do that, review for each item in the priority list the corresponding sections of the Reference Handbook, Part 2: Analytical Review, and  Part 3, Resources (case studies and demonstrations) related to them. Click on each link below to view explanations and related resources. You may also use the search feature to find relevant information.

    Team should use its judgment to further revise the priority lists by clicking on the appropriate priority item and either:

    1. Estimating the potential/value of ICT interventions in advancing the educational objectives by clicking on the corresponding title of the item in the List below or
    2. Deleting any priority items where the potential of ICT interventions is not clear or compelling.

    Before finalizing the revisions at this stage, the Facilitation Team may seek further input from ICT-in-education experts or individuals/institutions with relevant experience regarding the potential of ICT interventions in advancing the educational objectives in the different priority areas. The Team may download the priority lists and send them to such individuals seeking their informal advice.



    Step 4. Revise Priority Lists Considering Dynamics of Change


    Priority Item Details
    Educational Objective:
    Priority Item:

    Degree of Educational Urgency/Priority
    (Once the form is submitted a graphic summary appears below)

    Revising the Parameters
    Based on the dynamics for change at the system and school levels, revise the parameters that describe the priority item (descriptors) by performing any or both of the following activities:

    1. Go through the FORM below and delete some of the descriptors that you have chosen earlier, to bring the scope of the item to a tolerable level

    2. Refine the scope of any descriptor by adding a note under the corresponding category describing how the scope is refined. (Example: Secondary education is limited to Grades 7-9; Science is limited to Physics; Rural areas are limited to Region xxxx)

    Educational Level Refinement
    (You may specify more than one option)
     Not applicable
     All Levels
     Early Childhood Development
     Primary education
     Secondary education
     Tertiary education
     Adult non-vocational
     Vocational and technical education
    Add refining descriptors which revise the scope of educational levels.


    Target Population Refinement
    (You may specify more than one option)
     No specific target population
     Urban Areas
     Rural Areas
     Girls and Women
     Ethnic and/or linguistic minorities
     Learners with Disabilities
     Others

    (Please Specify):

    Add refining descriptors which revise the scope of target populations.


    Special Curricular Emphasis Refinement
    (You may specify more than one option)
     Not applicable
     All curricula
     Teacher Training
     Science education
     Health education
     Civic education
     Learners with disabilities
     Others

    (Please Specify):

    Add refining descriptors which revise the scope of curricular emphasis.


    Special Educational Focus
    Revise the scope of the Special Educational Focus.

     
      Step 4. Revising Educational Priority Lists in Light of Dynamics for Change
     

    Retrieve and print from the Filing Cabinet the following files related to Tool 1.4

    Dynamics for change at the system level (Summary)
    Dynamics for change at the system level (Summary)

    On the basis of this information, the Team should be able to decide the scope of the parameters of each area for which an ICT intervention is contemplated. What scope do the dynamics of change at the system level and school level tolerate? If the indicators of modalities of decision making, readiness and attitudes are all on the conservative, low and negative side, the Team may wish to consider limiting the number of priority areas as well as narrowing the scope of a priority item. On the other hand, if the indicators are progressive, high and positive, the Team may allow for a large number of priority items as well as wide scopes of priority areas. If the indicators are somewhere in-between, then the Team may consider in-between scopes.

    Based on the above analysis, the Facilitation Team should use its judgment to further revise the priority lists by performing any of the following two activities

    • Deleting items to bring the scope of priority areas to a tolerable level
    • Clicking on the Title of the Priority Item and editing the descriptors to reflect tolerable scope levels, by means of revising the scope of any or all of the following: educational levels, geographic areas, target populations, curricular emphasis, and problem focus.
    Before finalizing the revisions at this stage, the Facilitation Team may seek further input from ICT-in-education experts or individuals/institutions with relevant experience regarding the potential of ICT interventions in advancing the educational objectives in the different priority areas. The Team may download the priority lists and send them to such individuals seeking their informal advice.